EXHIBIT 17.4  Key Value Drivers by Scenario % Financial forecasts 2019A 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Continuing value Scenario assessment Scenario 1: New product is a top seller Revenue growth 5.0 12.0 15.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 5.0 3.5 New-product introduction leads to spike in revenue growth. After-tax operating margin 7.5 9.0 11.0 14.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 Margins improve to best in class as consumers pay a price premium for product. × Capital turnover, times 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 Capital turnover drops slighly during product launch as company builds inventory to meet expected demand. Return on invested capital 11.3 12.6 14.3 19.6 21.0 19.2 16.0 12.8 Scenario 2: Product launch fails Revenue growth 5.0 3.0 (1.0) (1.0) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Revenue growth drops as competitors steal share. After-tax operating margin 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.5 6.5 6.5 Lower prices put pressure on margins; cost reductions cannot keep pace. × Capital turnover, times 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 Capital efficiency falls as price pressure reduces revenue; inventory reductions mitigate fall. Return on invested capital 11.3 9.8 9.1 8.4 7.2 7.2 8.5 8.5 364 Creating Scenarios  365 (assuming interest rates have not changed, so the market value of debt equals the face value). The resulting equity value is $2,916 million. If the product launch fails, the DCF value of operations is only $1,993 mil- lion. In this scenario, the value of the subsidiaries is much lower ($276 mil- lion), as their business outlook has deteriorated due to the failure of the new product. The value of the debt is no longer $2,800 million in this scenario. Instead, the debt holders would end up with $2,269 million by seizing control of the enterprise. In scenario 2, the common equity would have no value. Given a two-thirds probability of success for the product, the probability- weighted equity value across both scenarios amounts to $1,954 million. Since estimates of scenario probabilities are likely to be rough at best, determine the range of probabilities that point to a particular strategic action. For instance, if this company were an acquisition target available for $1.5 billion, any prob- ability of a successful launch above 50 percent would lead to value creation. Whether the probability is 67 percent or 72 percent does not affect the decision outcome. When using the scenario approach, make sure to generate a complete valu- ation buildup from value of operations to equity value. Do not shortcut the process by deducting the face value of debt from the scenario-weighted value of operations. Doing this would seriously underestimate the equity value, be- cause the value of debt is different in each scenario. In this case, the equity value would be undervalued by $175 million ($2,800 million face value minus $2,625 million probability-weighted value of debt).3 A similar argument holds for nonoperating assets. EXHIBIT 17.5  Example of a Scenario Approach to DCF Valuation $ million Scenario 1: New product is a top seller Probability- weighted equity value: 1,954 67% probability Value of operations 5,044 The company’s new product launch reinvigorates revenue growth. Higher average selling prices lead to increased operating margins and consequently higher ROICs. ROICs decay as the new product matures, but future offerings keep ROIC above the cost of capital. Nonoperating assets 672 Enterprise value 5,716 Interest-bearing debt (2,800) Equity value 2,916 Scenario 2: Product launch fails 33% probability Value of operations 1,993 The company launches a new product, but the product is seen as inferior to other offerings. Revenue growth remains stagnant and even declines as prices erode and the company loses share. Returns on capital eventually rise to the cost of capital as management refocuses on cost reduction. Nonoperating assets 276 Enterprise value 2,269 Interest-bearing debt (2,269) Equity value – 3 Although this approach is typically recommended, deducting the market value of debt from enterprise value will lead to an inconsistent estimate of equity value if your estimate of default does not match market expectations. For more on how to correctly incorporate debt into the valuation, see Chapter 16.