144  Return on Invested Capital faster growth of these sectors relative to the rest of the economy, these sectors’ generally higher margins and returns on capital, and increases in these sec- tors’ margins and returns on capital. As a result, the life science and technol- ogy sectors generate six percentage points of the total 16 percent return on capital for the U.S. economy as a whole, compared with only two percentage points of a 12 percent overall return in 1995 (see Exhibit 8.6).9 ROIC by Industry To see how differences in ROIC across industries and companies relate to likely differences in drivers of competitive advantage, we examined varia- tions in ROIC by industry over the past two decades. Our findings are in line with results from prior editions of this book, in which we tracked profitability going back to the 1960s. Exhibit 8.7 shows the median returns on invested 9 The ROIC contribution is calculated as the total NOPAT of the life science and technology sectors divided by the invested capital of all sectors. Note that the aggregate ROIC for the total sample is close to the median ROIC of 12.4% in 1995, 16.7% in 2005, and 17.4% in 2017. EXHIBIT 8.5  Disaggregating ROIC of U.S.-Based Nonfinancial Companies, 1995–2017 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 25 20 15 10 5 0 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 NOPAT/sales, % ROIC excluding goodwill, % Invested capital excluding goodwill/sales Life sciences and technology1 Total x Note: ROIC, NOPAT/sales, and invested capital/sales are aggregate metrics. 1 Life sciences and techonology sectors comprise pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, health-care equipment and supplies, information services and software, and technology hardware, storage, and peripherals. Source: Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey. An Empirical Analysis of Returns on Invested Capital  145 capital for a range of industries during the periods 1995–1999 and 2013–2017. The exhibit reveals large differences in median ROIC across industries. Not surprisingly, industries with the highest returns, such as pharmaceuticals, health-care equipment, and technology-related businesses, are those with sustainable competitive advantages. In the case of pharmaceuticals and health-care equipment, this is due to patent-protected innovation. In technol- ogy-related businesses, advantage typically flows from increasing returns to scale and customer lock-in. The branded consumer goods and luxury goods sectors have high returns thanks to customer loyalty based on brand strength. The industries at the bottom of the chart tend to be those where it is difficult to achieve a price premium or cost advantage—often commodity-based in- dustries, including oil, gas, metals, and mining. Industries typically recognized for having higher returns have often been the ones that also deliver the clearest improvements in ROIC over time. The reasons vary by sector. For example, leading aerospace and defense compa- nies tend to focus on government contracts that include advance payments. This keeps the companies’ invested capital at low levels relative to revenues. The biotechnology sector matured over the past 20 years with large companies such as Amgen and Gilead generating outstanding returns from the successful development and marketing of innovative blockbuster drugs. Finally, technol- ogy players benefited from growth and innovation in hardware (via semicon- ductors, servers, and smartphones) and in software and services. As markets became increasingly global, the shift to more scalable online software and in- formation services also contributed to higher margins and returns; consider Facebook’s and YouTube’s growth in social media or Microsoft and Oracle in software. One outlier from this high-return club: the airline sector, which has EXHIBIT 8.6  Contribution of Life Sciences and Technology Industries to the Broader Economy, 1995–2017 Contribution to aggregate ROIC excluding goodwill for total sample, % 1995 9.5 Life sciences and technology Total aggregate ROIC for sample, % Other 11.7 16.6 16.2 2.2 2005 12.7 3.9 2017 10.0 6.2 Source: Corporate Performance Analytics by McKinsey.