56  Risk and the Cost of Capital their risk profile, unless the projects are so large that failure would threaten the viability of the entire company. Most executives are reluctant to take on smaller risky projects even if the returns are very high. By aggregating projects into portfolios, rather than assessing them individually, executives can often overcome excessive loss aversion. Our focus in this chapter will be on key principles. Chapter 15 provides detail on how to measure the cost of capital. Cost of Capital Is an Opportunity Cost The cost of capital is not a cash cost. It is an opportunity cost. To illustrate, when one company acquires another company, the alternative might have been to return that cash to shareholders, who could then reinvest it in other companies. So the cost of capital for the acquiring company is the price investors charge for bearing risk—what they could have earned by reinvest- ing the proceeds in other investments with similar risk.3 Similarly, when valuing individual business units or projects for strategic decision making, the correct cost of capital is what a company’s investors could expect to earn in other similarly risky projects, not necessarily the whole company. The core principle is that the cost of capital is driven by investors’ opportunity cost, because the executives leading the company are the investors’ agents and have a fiduciary responsibility to the company’s investors.4 That’s why the cost of capital is also referred to as the investors’ required return or expected return. The meaning of these terms may differ in academia, but for the most part you can use cost of capital, required return, and expected return interchangeably. Chapter 15 describes in detail how to estimate a company’s opportu- nity cost of capital. Most practitioners use a weighted average cost of capital (WACC), meaning the weighted average of the cost of equity capital and the cost of debt capital.5 For now, it’s enough to say that a company’s cost of eq- uity capital is what investors could earn by investing in a broad portfolio of 3 To be more precise, the cost of capital is the return investors can earn from investing in a well-diversi- fied, “efficient” portfolio of investments with similar risk. 5 The use of WACC is a practical solution. In theory, the opportunity cost of capital is independent of capital structure (a company’s amount of debt versus equity) except for the tax benefit of debt. An alternative is to estimate the opportunity cost of capital as the company’s cost of equity (what equity investors expect to earn) if it had no debt, adjusted directly for the tax benefit of debt. In theory, the two approaches should yield the same result. 4 In some countries, executives also have a duty to the “company,” but that concept is typically vaguely defined and does not provide executives with much guidance. For the most part, even in those coun- tries, the opportunity cost for investors is the best calculation to make. In the United States, a recent innovation is the “benefit” corporation, whose charter includes additional objectives that executives can weigh against the interest of shareholders, including positive impact on society, workers, commu- nities, and the environment. The concept is relatively new; not many large listed companies are benefit corporations, the conversion to which requires a shareholder vote.