18  Finance in a Nutshell Then they could compare the ROIC with what they could earn if they invested their capital elsewhere—for example, in the stock market. Lily and Nate had invested $10 million in their business, and in 2020 they earned about $1.8 million after taxes, with no debt. So they calculated their return on invested capital as 18 percent. They asked what a reasonable guess would be for the rate they could earn in the stock market, and we suggested they use 10 percent. They easily saw that their money was earning 8 percent more than what we were assuming they could earn by investing elsewhere, so they were pleased with their business’s performance. We commented that growth is also important to consider in measuring financial performance. Lily told us that the business was growing at about 5 percent per year. Nate added that they discovered growth can be expensive; to achieve that growth, they had to invest in new stores, fixtures, and inventory. To grow at 5 percent and earn 18 percent ROIC on their growth, they rein- vested about 28 percent of their profits back into the business each year. The remaining 72 percent of profits was available to withdraw from the business. In 2020, then, they generated cash flow of about $1.30 million. Lily and Nate were satisfied with 5 percent growth and 18 percent ROIC until Lily’s cousin Logan told them about his aggressive expansion plans for his own retail business, Logan’s Stores. Based on what Logan had said, Lily and Nate compared the expected faster growth in operating profit for Logan’s Stores with their own company’s 5 percent growth, as graphed in Exhibit 2.1. Lily and Nate were concerned that Logan’s faster-growing profits signaled a defect in their own vision or management. “Wait a minute,” we said. “How is Logan getting all that growth? What about his ROIC?” Lily and Nate checked and returned with the data shown in Exhibit 2.2. As we had suspected, Logan was achieving his growth by EXHIBIT 2.1  Expected Profit Growth at Logan’s Stores Outpacing Lily’s Dresses After-tax operating profit, $ thousand 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Lily’s Dresses Logan’s Stores 2020 2025 22 21 23 24 A New Concept  19 EXHIBIT 2.2  Lily’s Dresses Outperforming in Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) and Cash Flow ROIC, % 20 10 0 5 15 22 2020 21 23 24 2025 Lily’s Dresses Logan’s Stores Cash flow, $ thousand 22 23 2020 21 24 500 2025 0 1,000 1,500 2,000 Lily’s Dresses Logan’s Stores investing heavily. Despite all the growth in operating profit, his company’s ROIC was declining significantly, so cash flow was slipping downward. We asked the two why they thought their stores earned higher returns on capital than Logan’s. Nate said one reason was that their products were unique and cutting-edge fashion, so their customers were willing to pay higher prices for their dresses than for the products at many other dress shops. Lily added that each of their stores attracted more customers, so their sales per square foot (a proxy for fixed costs) were greater than Logan’s. As they saw it, Logan’s products were not much different from those of his competitors, so he had to match his prices to theirs and had less customer traffic in his stores. This discussion helped Nate and Lily appreciate that it was beneficial to consider ROIC along with growth. A New Concept Several years later, Lily and Nate called us with a great idea. They wanted to develop a new concept, which they called Lily’s Emporium. Lily’s Emporium would operate larger stores carrying a wider assortment of clothes and acces- sories that their talented designers were working on. But when they looked at the projected results (they now had a financial-analysis department), they found that all the new capital investment to convert their stores would reduce ROIC and cash flow for four years, even though revenue and profits would be 20  Finance in a Nutshell EXHIBIT 2.3  Expansion’s Impact on ROIC and Cash Flow ROIC, % 20 10 16 12 14 18 2020 21 22 24 23 2025 Base case: Lily’s Dresses Expansion case: Lily’s Dresses and Emporium Cash flow, $ thousand 22 2020 21 23 24 2025 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Base case: Lily’s Dresses Expansion case: Lily’s Dresses and Emporium growing faster, as shown in Exhibit 2.3. After four years, cash flow would be greater, but they didn’t know how to trade off the short-term decline in ROIC and cash flow against the long-term improvement. We affirmed that these were the right questions and explained that ­answering them would require more sophisticated financial tools. We advised them to use discounted cash flow (DCF), a measure that is also known as ­present value. DCF is a way of collapsing the future performance of the com- pany into a single number. Lily and Nate needed to forecast the future cash flow of the company and discount it back to the present at the same opportu- nity cost of capital we had used for our earlier comparisons. We helped Lily and Nate apply DCF to their new concept, discounting the projected cash flows at 10 percent. We showed them that the DCF value of their company would be $53 million if they did not adopt the new concept. With the new concept, the DCF value would be greater: $62 million. (Actually, on our spreadsheet, we rounded to the nearest thousand: $61,911,000.) These numbers gave them confidence in their idea for Lily’s Emporium. Should Lily and Nate Try to Maximize ROIC? As they saw how these financial measures could help them build a more valu- able business, Lily and Nate began to formulate more questions about mea- suring value. Lily asked if their strategy should be to maximize their return on