Decide How Much Cash Flow Risk to Take On  63 Decide How Much Cash Flow Risk to Take On Now let’s turn to cash flow risk. When we talk about total cash flow risk, we mean the uncertainty that a company faces about its future cash flows, whether for the company as a whole, a business unit, or a single project. Fi- nance theory provides guidance on pricing the nondiversifiable part of cash flow risk in the cost of capital. In theory, a company should take on all proj- ects or growth opportunities that have positive expected values even if there is high likelihood of failure, as long as the project is small enough that fail- ure will not put the company in financial distress. In practice, we’ve found that companies overweight the impact of losses from smaller projects, thereby missing value creation opportunities. For instance, how should a company think through whether to undertake a project—let’s call it project A—with a 60 percent chance of earning $8,000, a 40 percent chance of losing $2,000, and an expected value of $4,000? Theory says to take on all projects with a positive expected value, regardless of the upside-versus-downside risk. A company is likely to have many small proj- ects like this example, so for small projects, it should take on all projects with positive expected value, regardless of risk. But what if the company instead has one large project where the downside possibility would bankrupt the company? Consider an electric power com- pany with the opportunity to build a nuclear power facility for $15 billion (a realistic amount for a facility with two reactors). Suppose the company has $25 billion in existing debt and $25 billion in equity market capitalization. If the plant is successfully constructed and brought on line, there is an 80 percent EXHIBIT 4.3  Example of Equivalent Risk Premiums for Different Probability Levels of Failure   Risk premium, % Size of cash flow reduction, % 20 40 60 80 100 Probability of lower cash flow, % 10 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.7 20 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.5 30 0.4 0.8 1.3 1.9 2.6 40 0.5 1.1 1.9 2.8 4.0 50 0.7 1.5 2.6 4.0 6.0 A 1.5% risk premium is required, assuming even odds that an invest- ment will lose 40% of its value Note: This particular example is for a company with an indefinite life, assuming a smooth cash flow profile, 8% weighted average cost of capital, and 2% terminal growth. The cost of capital adjustments would be larger for a project with a short life. Source: R. Davis, M. Goedhart, and T. Koller, “Avoiding a Risk Premium That Unnecessarily Kills Your Project,” McKinsey Quarterly (August 2012).